Take Up Your Cross, Peter

A Homily for the Seventeenth Sunday after Pentecost

Texts: Isaiah 50:4-9; St. James 3:1-12; St. Mark 8:27-38


Grace to you and peace from God our Heavenly Father and Christ Jesus our Lord, who bids us take up our cross and follow him. Amen.

el_greco_-_las_lu00e1grimas_de_san_pedro
Saint Peter by El Greco

Saint Peter is hot-headed and impulsive, eager to step out in faith but fast to fall short, in equal measure profoundly faithful and unruly. And it kind of makes you wonder, given some the guidelines about teachers that James and Isaiah put forward, would either of them have called Peter as a pastor to their congregation?

The readings from Saint James and the prophet Isaiah give us a short glimpse of just some of the requirements for those called to lead God’s people. Teachers should have the ability to sustain the weary with a word, open ears, remain steadfast. They should tame their mouths, uttering blessings rather than curses. And, James is quick to remind us, those called to leadership as teachers “will be judged with greater strictness.”

Impulsive, quick to speak and faster to act, Peter might be exactly the type of person James had in mind when cautioning that not everyone is called to be teachers. Think back to the first two chapters of Saint James’ epistle. What about showing partiality? Peter – and all of the disciples – tend to be obsessed with where they will sit in the Kingdom, hoping for places of honor.

Peter certainly lets his tongue get the best of him; and, as Saint James implies, Simon Peter’s speech often drives his actions. If the tongue is the rudder of the ship or the bridle in the horse’s mouth, steering the entire person to-and-fro, then Peter’s tongue often leads him into trouble.

Let’s revisit Jesus walking on water. Thanks to some odd choices by the lectionary, it was sort of tacked on to one of the readings about bread. After the feeding of the five thousand, the disciples hop in the boat and sail off while Jesus stays behind to finally get some peace and quiet. During the night, he walks out to meet them on the sea. In all of the versions, the disciples see him and lose it. And who can blame them? But let’s look at Saint Matthew’s telling of this story, which gives us the extended “director’s cut.”  Peter says, Lord, I see you out there. Call me to you, and I will come. Jesus calls him, Peter hops out of the boat and gets a few steps. But then he starts to sink. His reaction is not to start swimming for the boat but to cry out, “Lord, save me!” It’s a dynamic portrayal of both faith and doubt, the two qualities that really get to the heart of who Peter is.

Or consider the events of Maundy Thursday. When Jesus warns that the one of the disciples will betray him, Peter confidently blurts out, “Even if I must die with you, I will never betray you.” But we all know what happens next: Peter falls asleep while he’s supposed to be praying, he cuts off someone’s ear, and then, standing outside the trial, he thrice denies he’s ever met Jesus.

Peter’s time following Christ on earth is marked by these highs and lows, often in quick succession. He goes from being the shining example of human faithfulness to a cautionary tale about human presumption, from first among the apostles to the type of person that James so sharply rebukes.

Today, we see this move in its sharpest focus and most immediate contrast.

“Who do you say that I am?” Jesus asks.

Peter answers, “You are the Messiah.” The Christ, God’s anointed, the one Israel has been waiting for, the fulfillment of God’s covenant with Abraham, Moses, Jacob, and David.

This is Peter’s moment to shine, his best moment in the Gospels. If we turn again to Matthew’s “director’s cut,” Jesus takes a moment to recognize the significance of this scene:

Blessed are you, Simon….I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven….

But then Jesus turns his attention towards Jerusalem and the cross. Suffering is coming, and those who would follow Jesus, who would follow the Messiah, must be prepared to take up their own cross.

Peter emphatically declares that it will not be so, taking the Messiah aside to scold him. “Lord, how can you say such things? We’ve seen you work wonders. You’ve cast out demons, walked across the waters, calmed the stormy seas. We’ve seen you raise the dead and walk unscathed through lynch mobs. How could anyone ever harm you? You’re going to waltz into Jerusalem and bring about Israel’s deliverance. But if you keep up all of this talk about suffering, people are going to start walking away. You’re embarrassing yourself so just stop it, ok? Stop.”

From affirmation to denial in only three verses.

Peter’s scolding draws forth its own stinging rebuke: “Get behind me, Satan.” Jesus tells Simon Peter to focus not on earthly kingdoms but the Kingdom of Heaven, not human greatness but God’s power. The Messiah tells the Rock and the rest of the disciples that they had better get used to the idea of suffering.

What Simon Peter, the wobbly rock, didn’t understand is what Isaiah spells out: the perfect teacher is the suffering servant who is beaten and betrayed but relies on God. To follow the Lord, then, to truly and fully understand what it means that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Most High God, is to take up your cross, to face down suffering while steadfastly trusting in the Lord.

We’ve seen the examples of how Peter failed in that regard: his violence at Gethsemane, his denial of Christ in the early hours of Good Friday. His words in the second half of today’s Gospel uncover that part of Peter most likely to turn away, most likely to trust in humanity rather than God.

martirio_di_san_pietro_september_2015-1a
Crucifixion of Saint Peter by Caravaggio

But we also know that, after hearing Mary Magdalene’s testimony, Peter was among the first to the tomb. And we’ve heard his bold proclamation in Jerusalem fifty days later at Pentecost. Throughout the rest of his life, we saw him imprisoned as he lead the Church. Peter became the first bishop of Rome – but this was not a position to be exploited. He didn’t enjoy the spoils of later popes. Being a bishop in the first century was dangerous, and eventually Peter’s ministry led to his own death. The Tradition has passed down the story of Peter’s eventual martyrdom. He who rebuked Jesus for preaching the way of the cross would eventually take up his cross and follow Christ. The one who denied the Messiah to save his own skin would eventually die bearing faithful witness to the Gospel of our Lord.

Beloved, we all experience that same tension that marked so much of Saint Peter’s life: the desire to live faithfully but also the tendency to focus on human things rather than the divine. As the service ends today, we will hear our charge:

Go in peace. Serve the Lord.

We’ll shout back, “Thanks be to God.” But how far will we make it before we turn our attention away from the Kingdom of God back to the ways of the world? How long will it take before we revert to that oh-so-human tendency to seek fame, fortune, and power? How long before your favorite vices begin to dominate your life again? How far out of the boat do you usually get before you start to sink back into your old ways? How long after confessing that Jesus is Lord do you begin to deny him?

We’ve been around long enough to see what happens to people who follow Jesus, who truly follow him. We know that for many of our brothers and sisters, following Christ has cost them their lives. But even here, even in a time and place where we can worship freely, we face the temptation to abandon the way of the cross and to focus on human things. We face the temptation to trade the true faith for one that bestows political power, to view our sisters and brothers as obstacles to be overcome rather than people to be loved, to harbor old grudges, to amass wealth at the cost of our neighbor. And to endure these temptations, to truly follow God, is costly. In a world where might makes right and poverty is a sign of failure, valuing humility, the poor, the outsider – to seek the Kingdom of God rather than human power – brings about scorn and mockery.

I’ve asked this before, but what do our neighbors really think about our food pantry? What do they think of us for who we invite over on Monday mornings?

We could pack this place, could have a much larger budget, have the finest vestments if we proclaimed a message of political power or health, wealth, and prosperity. We could be quite popular if we preached Christ without the cross. And it’s so tempting to chase that popular acclamation; we could gain the whole world. But that’s not the Gospel of our Lord. Christ instead calls us to pick up our cross and lay down our lives.

Dear friends, our crosses are heavy and painful. They’re terrifying. It’s so tempting to just set them down, to focus on human things.

In the face of temptation and fear, though, we know this: it is the Lord who helps and vindicates us. When we begin to sink below the waves, we can cry out like Peter, “Lord, save me.” When our crosses become too heavy, we have this assurance: Christ has already carried his cross, suffered death, and risen victorious. In this, we are set free to follow him. As the trials and tribulations of this world oppress us, we know that Christ has left us his Body and Precious Blood to nourish us, to forgive us, to give us the strength to endure, to bear the weight of the cross.

Amen.

 

“Additional Duties as Required”

Question: What exactly do you do?

Most parishioners see their clergy for two hours once a week. What is it that we do with the rest of our week? What do pastors do when they aren’t in the pulpit? What do deacons do when they’re not setting the Altar?

As one person asked me, “What is ‘work’ for you?”

I’ve gotten this question from a lot of people — but strangely never any members of my own parish. It’s almost as though folks are nervous to ask their own pastors but really, really want to know.

Before we dive in, though, some caveats:

  • Every pastor or deacon will have a different answer based on areas of expertise,  theological perspective, and setting. Someone called to  youth and family ministry will answer differently from a solo pastor who will answer differently from someone on a synod/diocesan staff. An Episcopal priest will have a different answer from a United Methodist elder. A priest serving in downtown Manhattan will divide their time differently from the pastor serving three churches in rural South Dakota.
  • I serve a part-time call. This necessitates that I delegate more work than a full-time pastor or deacon.
  • I’ve been at this for just about a year now. I bet I’ll have a different answer in a year and in five years and in a decade and when I retire. Or at least, I’ll probably have different wording.

So, what is it that I do when I’m not in the pulpit?

Short Answer: “Additional Duties as Required”

Continue reading ““Additional Duties as Required””

Abuse, Gay Priests, and the Real Problem

As #ChurchToo continues to unfold in what Whispers in the Loggia has dubbed “Crisis 2.0” (a reference to the major abuse cover-ups unveiled in 2002, most notably in Boston), most of the focus has been on the horrifying details of child sexual abuse.

A quieter narrative has focused sexual harassment and abuse of seminarians and younger clerics. Indeed, the key theme of Abp. Vigano’s “nuclear” letter is former-Cardinal McCarrick’s abuse of seminarians, which the former nuncio blames on a conspiracy of “homosexual networks.”

Cardinal Raymond Burke has furthered this line of thinking:

Now it seems clear in light of these recent terrible scandals that indeed there is a homosexual culture, not only among the clergy but even within the hierarchy, which needs to be purified at the root.

Such claims ignore the evidence in favor of arguing for ecclesial partisan ideology.

First, they ignore the presence of celibate gay priests and deacons who have neither violated their vows nor abused their parishioners. Instead, hacks like Vigano and Burke would have us believe that all gay men are abusers. There is no evidence to suggest this is the case, nor is there evidence to suggest that gay men abuse children at higher rates than heterosexuals.

Second, these claims also ignore the rampant sexual abuse of women within the Church. While much has been said about abusive Protestant pastors, the scandal in the Catholic Church has quietly ignored the rampant abuse of women.

The heartrending report from Pennsylvania focuses primarily on child abuse but points out that the investigation also uncovered rampant clerical abuse against women. The Daily Beast has reported on several women who were assaulted, abused, and harassed by Catholic church leaders, including the horrifying allegation that one woman was assaulted during a private Mass. Just as in the case of abuse against minors, the hierarchy conspired to cover up these crimes.

What we see unfolding in the Catholic Church, as in so many other religious communities, is not some sinister cabal of gay priests. Rather, it’s an abusive power structure more dedicated to the institution than to the protection of its members.

Until bishops like Burke and Vigano can identify the real problem and stop blaming ideological bogeymen, the abuse will continue.

Nevertheless, She Persisted: The Faith of the Syrophoenician Woman

A Homily for the Sixteenth Sunday after Pentecost

Texts: St. James 2:10-17; St. Mark 7:24-37


Grace to you and peace from God our Father and Christ Jesus our Lord, who came to feed the children of God. Amen.

We’ve seen something like this before.

rahib-canaanite-849-large
The Syrophoenician Woman, 17th. century Coptic manuscript

Jesus is staying at a home in the area near Tyre when a woman comes to him, asking that Christ might cast a demon out of her daughter. There’s a familiar pattern for healing stories and exorcisms like this. There will be some little exchange, the disciples will get annoyed, onlookers will scoff at the entire situation, and Jesus will tell the woman that she has great faith and the daughter will made well. Standard enough fare for the Gospels.

We see these healing narratives over and over again. So much so that we get used to them and, to be honest, we stop paying attention until the end. “Oh, hey. Jesus healed the person with…what was it this time? Another leper? Leprosy! Jesus healed the person with leprosy. Yea. Alright.” They get a little boring, we lose focus, and the details often evade us as long as it’s a happy ending.

Usually, any sort of disturbing details are floating just under the surface; they demand a close reading of the text to really get at the real point of the story. But not this time. Today, one point of the story grabs us by the collar and slaps us in the face. A Gentile woman approaches Jesus and she needs help. She follows the social conventions of the day, coming to him in a home and throwing herself at his feet. She’s trying to follow the cultural norms for approaching a teacher with a request. And Jesus of Nazareth compares her to a dog. Continue reading “Nevertheless, She Persisted: The Faith of the Syrophoenician Woman”

“Prominent Among the Apostles:” Women in Ministry and #ChurchToo

junia
St. Junia, “Prominent among the apostles”

As #ChurchToo continues to unfold, the call for women in leadership has grown both in traditions which ordain women and traditions that do not. Even before the latest round of abuse revelations, the Catholic Church was beginning a conversation about ordaining women as deacons. Now is the time for full equality, and that means ordination. Continue reading ““Prominent Among the Apostles:” Women in Ministry and #ChurchToo”

Saint James, Law, and Gospel

A Homily for the Fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost

Texts: St. James 1:17-27; St. Mark 7:1-8, 14-15, 21-23


Grace to you and peace from God our Heavenly Father and Christ Jesus our Lord, our Perfect Law Giver. Amen.

If we’re being honest, we’ve all known someone like the Pharisees in today’s Gospel reading: quick to chime in with an accusatory question and judging “side-eye.” In contemporary speech, “Pharisee” is synonymous with exactly this type of person, an arrogant and legalistic disciplinarian slavishly devoted to a strict interpretation of the rules quick to render an unrequested verdict.

“Your disciples eat without washing their hands? Bless their hearts.”

“Oh. You let your children watch that movie? Aren’t you worried that it might corrupt their young mind?”

“You listen to that kind of music? I shouldn’t be surprised. ‘Garbage in, garbage out,’ as they say.” Continue reading “Saint James, Law, and Gospel”

On Allegations Against the Pope

The scandals of the Catholic Church continue to unfold, and they have now come to the Vatican itself.

The past two months have seen a harsh light unveiling more and more corruption within the Church. Even as many struggle to grasp the scope of abuse in Pennsylvania, new investigations are beginning in Saint Louis. Other states may be next, including Minnesota (which has already seen major scandals in two diocese). An author at America reminds readers that as horrific as the clerical abuse scandals are, there is likely a larger abuse scandal looming in Catholic homes. Bishops continue to claim that abuse is in the past, willfully ignoring survivors and family members still struggling in the present. The Faithful, kept in the dark and put in danger by their shepherds, are confronting a legacy of violence and facing the difficult decision of whether or not to leave the Church. Brother Casey Cole, a Franciscan deacon approaching his priestly ordination, has voiced his own struggle to comprehend the myriad sins of the Church he loves so much, going so far as to tell his audience that he understands if they want to leave. Continue reading “On Allegations Against the Pope”

“Receive What You Are”

A Homily for the Fourteenth Sunday after Pentecost

Text: St. John 6:56-69


Grace to you and peace from God our Heavenly Father and Christ Jesus our Lord, the Living Bread of Heaven. Amen.

A few weeks ago, we found ourselves in relatively safe territory. Jesus miraculously multiplied a few loaves of bread and a handful of fish to feed over five thousand people, a sign of God’s abiding provision. It’s a familiar story, even if it pushes us to trust in God in a way that not even the disciples Philip and Andrew could.

But as we quickly learned, that was just the prelude, and Saint John’s discourse on bread quickly took a turn towards the obscure. Soon and very soon, Jesus and the Jewish leaders were debating the finer points of Moses, mana, and the Exodus, what it means for bread to come from heaven and give eternal life, and our Lord boldly proclaimed, “I AM the Bread of Life.” And if that wasn’t difficult enough to understand, he then pushed it further, inviting us to feast on his flesh and to drink his blood. Predictably, the Jewish people – for whom cannibalism and consuming blood are decidedly not kosher – were disgusted by this invitation. (And they were not alone: the Romans, too, would later accuse the early Church of practicing cannibalism.)

This teaching is difficult. Who can accept it? Continue reading ““Receive What You Are””

A Response to #ChurchToo: Giving Rise to Women’s Voices

Given what has become a near-daily horror show of sexual abuse allegations in the Church* and across the theological spectrum, what hope is there?

I hear the critics now. “Our only hope is in Christ! We are wretched sinners, and this crisis is because we don’t place enough trust in God!”

Ok. Yeah. Sure. That’s true. So let’s follow this line of thought to its conclusion. Let’s put our hope in God and listen for the Spirit. What’s she calling us to do? If we are the Body of Christ, what healing work are we to do with his hands?

More than empty apologies, more than mass resignations, more than long-delayed exploratory committees, we need women’s voices. Continue reading “A Response to #ChurchToo: Giving Rise to Women’s Voices”